Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15336
Journal Title: Phosphate fertiliser source—Gunningbland NSW 2009 to 2012
Other Titles: Southern NSW research results 2014
Authors: McMaster, Colin
Keywords: 2009, 2012, canola, grain yield, grey vertosol, Gunningbland, MAP, phosphorus, wheat
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Department of Primary Industries
Abstract: Key findings • High-analysis granular fertiliser (MAP) was the most profitable P source. • Liquid forms of P performed well, but high purchase price reduced profitability. • Rock phosphate did not improve grain yield (averaged over three years) or residual soil P. • Additional biological inoculants applied to rock phosphate did not significantly improve response greater than MAP. • Consider long-term implication of P fertiliser source and application rate. If P rates are reduced, the residual soil P benefit will also be reduced. • Growing season rainfall will impact crop response to freshly applied P. • Growers must consider fertiliser effectiveness and cost ($ per unit of P) when considering P fertiliser source. • It was more profitable to apply no fertiliser than apply rock phosphate.
URI: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15336
ISSN: 2652-6948
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
SRR14-4 McMaster phosphate fertiliser source-+.pdf231.09 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing