Summer herbicide trials on prickly lettuce 2015–16

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15318

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Wu, Hanwen	-
dc.contributor.author	Shephard, Adam	-
dc.contributor.author	Hopwood, Michael	-
dc.contributor.author	Fritsch, Colin	-
dc.date.accessioned	2024-09-25T05:28:00Z	-
dc.date.available	2024-09-25T05:28:00Z	-
dc.date.issued	2015	-
dc.identifier.issn	2652-6948	-
dc.identifier.uri	https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15318	-
dc.description.abstract	Key findings »» After stem elongation, mature prickly lettuce plants are difficult to control. »» Controlling mature prickly lettuce plants early achieves better results. »» No single treatments, except paraquat, achieved 100% control of mature prickly lettuce plants that emerged after a wheat crop was harvested. The paraquat, either used alone or as a follow-up application, was the only outstanding treatment, achieving 100% control.	en
dc.publisher	Department of Primary Industries	en
dc.subject	2015, 2016, cereals, double-knock, herbicide, Lake Cowal, lucerne, paraquat, prickly lettuce, resistance, southern, Temora	en
dc.title	Summer herbicide trials on prickly lettuce 2015–16	en
dc.title.alternative	Southern NSW research results 2015	en
dc.type	Book chapter	en
Appears in Collections:	DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
SRR15-54-Wu Shephard prickly lettuce-+.pdf		120.42 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Who's citing

NSW Dept of Planning and Environment