Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20406
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSimpfendorfer, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-11T03:32:01Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-11T03:32:01Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20406-
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2010, Canowindra, central, Coolah, Coonamble, economic benefit, foliar spray, Galong, Gerogery, North Star, northern, resistance, southern, sprayed, Spring Ridge, stripe rust, Trangie, unsprayed, variety, wheat, Willbriggie, yield lossen
dc.titleSprayed vs unsprayed wheat national variety trials in 2010 – what did we learn?en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2012en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR2012-37 Simpfendorfer wheat spray NVT.pdf530.44 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing