Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20365
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorMorphett, Stephen-
dc.contributor.authorMortell, Patrick-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-06T05:35:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-06T05:35:05Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20365-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Suntop[PBR] appears to behave similarly to EGA Gregory[PBR] in terms of both yield and grain protein accumulation, which means that the N removal on a per hectare basis is equivalent to other varieties. • EGA Gregory[PBR] has the same NUE as most other bread wheat commercially available. • LongReach Spitfire[PBR] appears unique in the fact that, unlike EGA Gregory[PBR], even when it achieves higher yields it is still able to maintain protein concentration, giving it the potential to remove more N per hectare. • Limited responses from in-crop N applications reported here highlights the risk associated with the reliability of in-crop rainfall to make use of these applications in the northern region.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2012, grain protein, grain yield, Moree, nitrogen, nutrition, side banded, split application, Spring Ridge, variety, wheaten
dc.titleResponse of six wheat varieties to varying N nutrition – Spring Ridge and Moree 2012en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2013en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR13-63 Gardner wheat nitrogen 2012-+.pdf284.56 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing