Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20353
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorBambach, Rod-
dc.contributor.authorHosking, Jan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-06T03:42:10Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-06T03:42:10Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20353-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • There was no significant affect of sulfur (S) application on grain yield, oil content or protein in the trials reported here, which supports the findings of other trials conducted in the Central West and Northern regions. • The lack of S response suggests the need to re-evaluate S nutrition tactics and critical soil test levels. • In contrast there were large responses to nitrogen (N). Grain yield and dry matter accumulation significantly increased with increases in N application up to 120 and 200 kg N/ha at Moree and Blackville, respectively. • Grain protein and oil content were inversely related. Increases in protein, from increased N application, caused oil content to decline.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2012, Blackville, canola, dry matter, grain yield, gypsum, harvest index, Moree, nitrogen rate, nutrition, oil content, protein, sulfur, urea, varietyen
dc.titleNitrogen and sulfur nutrition in canola at Blackville and Moree in 2012en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2013en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR13-51 Gardner canola nutrition 2012-+.pdf148.78 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing