Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20304
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorSerafin, Loretta-
dc.contributor.authorFormann, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorPottie, Dougal-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-05T01:50:44Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-05T01:50:44Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20304-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Westminster[PBR] produced the greatest dry matter for grazing of all the barley varieties and still only had a significantly lower grain yield than one variety, Urambie[PBR]. • Urambie[PBR] produced the highest grain yield that was significantly better than four other varieties. However, it produced the poorest quality grain of all varieties with extremely pinched grain (>20% screenings). • Utilising spring barley varieties for short grazing periods may provide an opportunity to rest early sown grazing cereals. • It is also recommended that if spring barley varieties are going to be grazed that they are sown 7–10 days earlier to maximise biomass accumulation and compensate for delayed flowering time.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2012, barley, dry matter, dual purpose, grain quality, grain yield, grazing, nitrogen, Somerton, varietyen
dc.titleGrazing potential and grain recovery of eight spring barley varieties – Somerton 2012en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2013en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR13-2 Gardner barley Somerton-+.pdf192.05 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing