Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20299
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrooke, Greg-
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Leigh-
dc.contributor.authorVerrell, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorBrill, Rohan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-04T00:32:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-04T00:32:31Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20299-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • There was a significant response from applying all nutrients above Nil (0.39 t/ha). • The greatest yield and protein losses were incurred where no Nitrogen (N) was applied (–0.73 t/ha). • Yield losses occurred also where any other nutrient was excluded with some being statistically significant – Calcium, Iron, Potassium, Magnesium, Phosphorus.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2013, black vertosol, Coonamble, dry, macro nutrients, micro nutrients, moisture stress, nitrogen, nutrition, phosphorus, protein, urea, wheat, yielden
dc.titleEffect of macro and micro nutrients on yield and protein in wheat – Coonamble 2013en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2014en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR-14-48 Brooke nutrition wheat Coonamble-+.pdf147.62 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing