Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20281
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Moore, Kevin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hobson, Kristy | - |
dc.contributor.author | Harden, Steve | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jenkins, Leigh | - |
dc.contributor.author | Brill, Rohan | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-31T03:40:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-31T03:40:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2208-8199 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20281 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Key findings • Yield varied significantly with chickpea genotype at two sites, one with high starting numbers of Pt, the other with no detectable Pt. • The new kabuli, PBA Monarch[PBR], yielded as well as the industry standards Jimbour and PBA HatTrick[PBR]. • Three interspecific hybrids also performed well. • There was no evidence that an experimental product had any beneficial effect on yield in the presence or absence of Pt. | en |
dc.publisher | Department of Primary Industries | en |
dc.subject | 2013, BAY, chickpea, Coonamble, disease infection level, pesticide, Pratylenchus neglectus, Pratylenchus thornei, seed treatment, Trangie, variety, yield | en |
dc.title | Chickpea yields with and without Pratylenchus thornei – Coonamble & Trangie 2013 | en |
dc.title.alternative | Northern NSW research results 2014 | en |
dc.type | Book chapter | en |
Appears in Collections: | DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present] |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
NRR-14-33 Moore chickpea Pratylenchus thornei-+ .pdf | 261.42 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.