Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20281
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Kevin-
dc.contributor.authorHobson, Kristy-
dc.contributor.authorHarden, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Leigh-
dc.contributor.authorBrill, Rohan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-31T03:40:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-31T03:40:35Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20281-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Yield varied significantly with chickpea genotype at two sites, one with high starting numbers of Pt, the other with no detectable Pt. • The new kabuli, PBA Monarch[PBR], yielded as well as the industry standards Jimbour and PBA HatTrick[PBR]. • Three interspecific hybrids also performed well. • There was no evidence that an experimental product had any beneficial effect on yield in the presence or absence of Pt.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2013, BAY, chickpea, Coonamble, disease infection level, pesticide, Pratylenchus neglectus, Pratylenchus thornei, seed treatment, Trangie, variety, yielden
dc.titleChickpea yields with and without Pratylenchus thornei – Coonamble & Trangie 2013en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2014en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR-14-33 Moore chickpea Pratylenchus thornei-+ .pdf261.42 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing