Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20278
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSimpfendorfer, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorFensbo, Finn-
dc.contributor.authorShapland, Robyn-
dc.contributor.authorBrooke, Greg-
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Jayne-
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Leigh-
dc.contributor.authorBrill, Rohan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-31T03:20:59Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-31T03:20:59Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20278-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • The impact of crown rot on yield at this site was only moderate in 2013. • LRPB Dart[PBR] was the only variety higher yielding than EGA_Gregory[PBR] in the presence of crown rot. • Fungicide application provided no benefit in the absence of crown rot infection but all application techniques provided a 0.30 t/ha benefit in the presence of crown rot infection. However, they do not provide complete control. • Slashing at GS30 reduced yield by 0.30 t/ha in the absence of crown rot but had no yield penalty in the presence of crown rot infection.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2013, bread wheat, crown rot, durum, fungicide, fusarium, inoculum, Predicta-B, protein, slashing, Trangie, variety, yielden
dc.titleRegional crown rot management – Trangie 2013en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2014en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR-14-30 Simpfendorfer crown rot Trangie-+.pdf324.67 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing