Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20270
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSimpfendorfer, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorFensbo, Finn-
dc.contributor.authorShapland, Robyn-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-30T22:31:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-30T22:31:09Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20270-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • QT14381, Suntop[PBR], LRPB Spitfire[PBR] and Sunguard[PBR] were between 0.52 t/ha to 0.30 t/ha higher yielding than EGA_ Gregory[PBR] under high crown rot pressure. • Targeting fungicide application at the base of plants increased yield under high crown rot pressure by 0.36 t/ha with droppers and 0.20 t/ha with the on crop application. However, they do not provide complete control. Application 50 cm above crop height provided no benefit. • Slashing reduced yield by 0.42 t/ha with no added CR but had no yield penalty with added CR.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2013, bread wheat, crown rot, durum, fungicide, fusarium, inoculum, Predicta-B, protein, slashing, variety, Westmar, yielden
dc.titleRegional crown rot management – Westmar Qld 2013en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2014en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR-14-22 Simpfendorfer crown rot Westmar-+.pdf330.42 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing