Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20214
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHertel, Kathi-
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Craig-
dc.contributor.authorHarden, Steven-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-24T03:39:18Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-24T03:39:18Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20214-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Moonbi[PBR] and Richmond[PBR], two varieties released from the Australian Soybean Breeding Program have both shown improvement over the now outclassed Soya791 in the areas of yield, seed size and seed quality in this experiment. • Overall site yield was 2.01 t /ha. RichmondA, released in 2014 yielded 133% of the site average. There was no significant yield difference between Moonbi[PBR] and Richmond[PBR]. The lowest yielding variety was Hale at 1.16 t/ha or just 58% of the site average. • Soya791 results should be treated with caution. Seed quality was poor and despite adjustments to seeding rates, poor establishment and subsequent growth compromised performance throughout the season.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2013, 2014, establishment, flowering, height, Pine Ridge, protein, seed size, soybean, target plant population, variety, yielden
dc.titleSoybean variety comparison – Liverpool Plains 2013–14en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2015en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR15-42-Hertel Chapman soybean-+.pdf298.82 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing