Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20210
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSimpfendorfer, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorFensbo, Finn-
dc.contributor.authorShapland, Robyn-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-24T03:27:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-24T03:27:22Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20210-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Only the bread wheat variety Suntop[PBR] was higher yielding (0.75 t/ha) than EGA Gregory[PBR] under high levels of crown rot infection. • In‑crop fungicide application at GS33 provided a small yield benefit when targeted at the base of plants infected with crown rot with the on crop (0.34 t/ha) and dropper (0.40 t/ha) treatments.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2014, barley, bread wheat, cereals, crown rot, durum, foliar spray, fungicide, fusarium, grain protein, inoculum, Predicta B, variety, Westmar, winter, yielden
dc.titleRegional crown rot management – Westmar Queensland 2014en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2015en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR15-39-Simpfendorfer Fensbo crown rot Westmar-+.pdf311.96 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing