Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20208
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSimpfendorfer, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorFensbo, Finn-
dc.contributor.authorShapland, Robyn-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-24T03:13:16Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-24T03:13:16Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20208-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Only the bread wheat variety Mitch[PBR] was higher yielding (0.74 t/ha) than EGA GregoryA under high levels of crown rot infection. • The performance of the barley variety Commander[PBR] was poor at this site with 64% (2.65 t/ha) yield loss from high crown rot infection. This emphasises that barley is very susceptible to crown rot infection and if early stress occurs this disease can significantly impact on biomass production and subsequent yield. • In‑crop fungicide application at GS30 provided a small (0.19 t/ha) yield benefit when targeted at the base of plants infected with crown rot using droppers.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2014, barley, bread wheat, cereals, crown rot, durum, foliar spray, fungicide, fusarium, grain protein, inoculum, Macalister, Predicta B, variety, winter, yielden
dc.titleRegional crown rot management – Macalister Queensland 2014en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2015en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR15-37-Simpfendorfer Fensbo crown Macalister-+.pdf306.33 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing