Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20207
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSimpfendorfer, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Rick-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-24T03:09:39Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-24T03:09:39Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20207-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Sunguard [PBR], EGA Wylie [PBR], Mitch [PBR], LRPB Lancer [PBR] and Commander [PBR] were between 0.59 t/ha to 0.37 t/ha higher yielding than EGA Gregory [PBR] under high crown rot pressure. • Variety selection is not the sole solution to crown rot with the best entries still suffering around 40% yield loss at this site where a full soil moisture profile at planting, late sowing and limited in‑crop rainfall were very conducive to disease expression. • Crown rot also negatively impacted on grain quality with a 0.6 to 1.4% decrease in protein levels and a 3 to 16% increase in the level of screenings in the majority of entries.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2013, barley, bread wheat, cereals, crown rot, durum, fusarium, grain protein, inoculum, Predicta B, Rowena, screenings, variety, winter, yielden
dc.titleYield response of wheat, barley and durum varieties to crown rot – Rowena 2013en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2015en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR15-36-Simpfendorfer Graham crown rot barley durum-+.pdf281.77 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing