Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20201
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSimpfendorfer, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorFensbo, Finn-
dc.contributor.authorShapland, Robyn-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-24T02:20:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-24T02:20:47Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20201-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • LRPB Spitfire [PBR], and Suntop [PBR] were between 0.44 t/ha to 0.66 t/ha higher yielding than EGA Gregory [PBR] under high levels of crown rot infection. • LRPB Spitfire [PBR] was also the only entry to have screening levels under 5% in the presence of high crown rot infection and tough seasonal conditions at this site in 2014. • In‑crop fungicide application at GS39, even when targeted at the base of plants infected with crown rot, did not provide any benefit in EGA Gregory [PBR] at this site.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2014, barley, bread wheat, cereals, crown rot, durum, foliar spray, fungicide, fusarium, grain protein, Mungindi, screenings, variety, winter, yielden
dc.titleRegional crown rot management – Mungindi 2014en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2015en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR15-30-Simpfendorfer Fensbo crown rot Mungindi-+.pdf321.8 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing