Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20191
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Moore, Kevin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hobson, Kristy | - |
dc.contributor.author | Harden, Steve | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nash, Paul | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chiplin, Gail | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bithell, Sean | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-23T23:54:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-23T23:54:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2208-8199 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20191 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Key findings • Susceptibility of chickpea pods to Ascochyta Blight is important as infection can cause pod abortion and blemish or kill seed; infected seed is also an inoculum source for subsequent crops. • Field trial results indicate that, contrary to current opinion, chickpea varieties do differ in the susceptibility of their pods to Ascochyta. • The results suggest that varietal resistance of chickpea pods is similar to that of vegetative tissue. | en |
dc.publisher | Department of Primary Industries | en |
dc.subject | 2014, ascochyta, chickpea, pods, sample collection, Tamworth | en |
dc.title | Chickpea Ascochyta – evidence that varieties do differ in susceptibility of pods | en |
dc.title.alternative | Northern NSW research results 2015 | en |
dc.type | Book chapter | en |
Appears in Collections: | DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present] |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
NRR15-23-Moore Hobson chickpea ascochyta difference-+.pdf | 279.77 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.