Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20188
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Kevin-
dc.contributor.authorHobson, Kristy-
dc.contributor.authorSambasivam, Prabhakran-
dc.contributor.authorFord, Rebecca-
dc.contributor.authorHarden, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorNash, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorChiplin, Gail-
dc.contributor.authorBithell, Sean-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-23T23:29:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-23T23:29:47Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20188-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Ascochyta blight occurred in more chickpea crops in the northern region in 2014 than in 2012 and 2013 combined. Most infected crops were PBA HatTrick[PBR] but this is also the most commonly grown variety. • Infections in 2014 arose from inoculum in diseased chickpea stubble and infected volunteers. • Research confirmed the fungus varies in its pathogenic ability but there was no evidence it has changed in response to the widespread cultivation of PBA HatTrick[PBR]. • In localities where Ascochyta was found in 2014, growers are advised to apply an early season preventative fungicide to all 2015 chickpea crops including PBA HatTrick[PBR].en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subjectascochyta, blight, chickpea, Garah, lesions, North Star, stubble, Tooraweenahen
dc.titleChickpea Ascochyta – is the pathogen changing?en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2015en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR15-21-Moore Hobson chickpea ascochyta-+.pdf288.37 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing