Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20183
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCook, Tony-
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, Bill-
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Bec-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-23T04:04:18Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-23T04:04:18Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20183-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Glyphosate resistant sowthistle was fully controlled by tank mixes of selected systemic herbicides and paraquat at the early flowering growth stage. • There was no difference in control between day and night applications of these tank mixes. • Although glyphosate resistant, the sowthistle was controlled with a treatment containing a mix of glyphosate + paraquat when applied either during day time or during the evening. • A tank mix of paraquat and VelocityR appears to have good potential due to its excellent early brownout of sowthistle, irrespective of day or evening application. The brownout (speed of plant death) was faster than the other treatments examined in this study.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2014, brownout, control, controlled environment, flowering, glyphosate, glyphosate, herbicide, paraquat, resistance, sowthistle, Tamworthen
dc.titleComparison of systemic herbicide and paraquat tank mixtures applied under sunlight or evening conditions on glyphosate resistant sowthistle – pot experiment 2014en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2015en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR15-16-Cook Davidson sowthistle-+.pdf271.89 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing