Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/16070
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSimpfendorfer, Steven-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-18T00:51:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-18T00:51:03Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/16070-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Yield in the presence of crown rot was generally barley > bread wheat > durum across both sowing times, but significant differences were evident between varieties. • Barley, bread wheat and durum varieties differ in their extent of yield loss from crown rot and their actual yield and grain quality (screenings) in the presence of this disease. • However, all varieties are susceptible to crown rot infection and will not significantly reduce inoculum levels for subsequent crops. Variety choice is not a sole solution to crown rot.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2014, barley, bread wheat, crown rot, durum, grain protein, heat, inoculum, screenings, sowing date, Tamworth, variety, yielden
dc.titleResponse of barley, durum and bread wheat varieties to crown rot across two sowing times – Tamworth 2014en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2016en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR2016-Simpfendorfer barley durum wheat crown rot Tamworth-+.pdf162.97 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing