1. DPIE eLibrary
  2. Primary Industries and Regional Publications
  3. DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15581
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Kevin-
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Lisa-
dc.contributor.authorHobson, Kristy-
dc.contributor.authorHarden, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Willy-
dc.contributor.authorKing, Kris-
dc.contributor.authorChiplin, Gail-
dc.contributor.authorBithell, Sean-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T05:00:00Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-17T05:00:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15581-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • In a wet season, substantial yield losses (94%) from Phytophthora root rot (PRR) occurred in susceptible chickpea varieties such as PBA Boundary[PBR]. • Varieties with improved resistance to PRR (PBA HatTrick[PBR] and Yorker[PBR]) can also have large yield losses (68–79%) in a season highly conducive to PRR. • Although yield losses will occur in seasons highly conducive to PRR, crosses between chickpea and wild Cicer species, such as the PBA breeding line CICA1328, currently offer the best levels of PRR resistance.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2015, chickpea, fungicide, inoculum, metalaxyl, phytophthora root rot, PRR, thiabendazole, thiram, variety, Warwick, yielden
dc.titleChickpea Phytophthora root rot – 2015 varietal rankings and yield lossesen
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2016en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR2016-Moore Kelly PRR chickpea rankings-+.pdf144.46 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing