Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15526
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSimpfendorfer, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorBrooke, Greg-
dc.contributor.authorPotts, Ryan-
dc.contributor.authorShapland, Robyn-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-16T04:01:15Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-16T04:01:15Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15526-
dc.description.abstractKey findings •• Yield loss from crown rot ranged from not significant in the variety DBA Lillaroi[PBR] and seven of the 13 bread wheat varieties, up to 32.9% in the durum variety Jandaroi[PBR]. •• Only the bread wheat variety Mitch[PBR] was higher yielding (0.41 t/ha) than the susceptible bread wheat variety EGA Gregory[PBR] in the presence of high levels of crown rot infection. •• Grain protein levels were low across the site and varied from 7.7% in Mitch[PBR] up to 10.1% in the durum line 190873. Crown rot infection did not affect protein levels in any entry. •• Crown rot infection caused a small (1–2%), but significant, increase in the level of screenings in the barley variety La Trobe[PBR], and 10 of the 13 bread wheat entries.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2016, barley, bread wheat, crown rot, durum, fusarium, Gilgandra, grain protein, inoculum, northern, screenings, variety, yield lossen
dc.titleRegional crown rot management – Gilgandra 2016en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2017en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR2017-27-Simpf-+.pdf153.05 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing