Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15514
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWood, Jenny-
dc.contributor.authorKeir, Catherine-
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Leigh-
dc.contributor.authorVerrell, Andrew-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T04:20:46Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-15T04:20:46Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15514-
dc.description.abstractKey findings •• The 2013 Tamworth and 2014 Trangie environments were not conducive to high levels of seed markings, with all varieties having <5% tiger stripe/blotches. •• The later sown chickpeas had a lower incidence of seed markings in two of the three environments. •• The 2015 Tamworth experiment was conducive to seed markings for the first sowing date (SD1). In this case, the most susceptible commercial varieties were PBA Pistol[PBR] and PBA Boundary[PBR], with 9.7% and 6.7% of individual seeds having tiger stripe/blotches respectively. •• All five kabuli varieties did not display any seed markings in any of the three environments. •• All desi varieties showed at least low levels of tiger stripe/blotch type markings in one or more of the three environments and two sowing dates.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2013, 2015, chickpea, seed marking, sowing date, Tamworth, Trangie, varietyen
dc.titleSusceptibility of chickpea varieties to seed markings – Tamworth and Trangie 2013–2015en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2017en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR2017-15-Wood-+.pdf400.01 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing