Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15461
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaird, Jon-
dc.contributor.authorLonergan, Gerard-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-03T00:28:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-03T00:28:47Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15461-
dc.description.abstractKey findings •• No-till wheat (0.97 t/ha) produced the highest grain yield compared with the full cultivation and plant line cultivation wheat treatments (0.67 and 0.70 t/ha respectively). •• No-till chickpea (0.64 t/ha) yielded higher than the plant line cultivation chickpea (0.37 t/ha). •• No-till chickpea resulted in the highest gross margin of the double-cropped treatments ($131/ha). •• Wheat had a greater water use efficiency (WUE) than chickpea, and also had higher grain production. •• Cultivating (either plant line or full cultivation) after the dryland cotton crop decreased cotton volunteers and ratoons by >100 plants/ha (184 days after cotton harvest) compared with no-till treatments.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2016, 2017, cereals, chickpea, chocolate vertosol, cotton, grain yield, gross margins, Narrabri, no-till, rain-fed, ripping, variety, volunteer control, water use efficiency, wheaten
dc.titleInvestigating the effect from rain-fed cotton on grain production in northern farming systems – 2016/17en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2018en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR-2018-Baird-2-+.pdf539.52 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing