Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15453
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSimpfendorfer, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorBrooke, Greg-
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Rick-
dc.contributor.authorShapland, Robyn-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-02T01:28:40Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-02T01:28:40Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15453-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Average yield loss from crown rot across the six field sites in 2017 ranged from 16% (0.46 t/ha) in the bread wheat variety Sunguard[PBR] to up to 50% (1.32 t/ha) in the durum variety DBA Bindaroi[PBR]. • A variety’s resistance rating was not a good reflection of its yield performance when infected with crown rot as tolerance level also dictates the rate of yield loss from this disease. • Variety choice resulted in an 8–34% yield benefit over growing the standard bread wheat variety EGA Gregory[PBR] when infected with crown rot. • Variety choice is not the sole solution to crown rot. • Variety choice can maximise profit in the current season, but does not reduce inoculum levels for subsequent cereal crops as all are susceptible to crown rot infection.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2017, barley, bread wheat, central, cereals, crown rot, durum, Edgeroi, fusarium, Gilgandra, inoculum, Meandarra, northern, Rowena, variety, Westmar, winter, Wongarbon, yielden
dc.titleCrown rot resistance rating does not necessarily reflect yield performance when disease is present – six sites in 2017en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2019en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR-2019-P24-Simpfendorfer-+.pdf290.02 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing