Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15433
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBithell, Sean-
dc.contributor.authorHobson, Kristy-
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Willy-
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Merrill-
dc.contributor.authorHarden, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Kevin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-01T04:55:23Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-01T04:55:23Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15433-
dc.description.abstractKey findings •Crosses between chickpea and wild Cicer species, such as the breeding lines CICA1328, CICA1718 and CICA1812, offer improved levels of resistance to phytophthora root rot (PRR). •Avoid paddocks prone to waterlogging, with poorly drained areas, or a history of lucerne, medics or chickpea PRR. •Use the most PRR-resistant varieties (rated MR) where there is a disease risk. •A higher number of chickpea varieties now have improved resistance to PRR, but substantial yield losses (40–68%) can still occur, even in a relatively dry season, if one soil saturation rainfall event occurs.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2018, chickpea, Cicer, grain yield, metalaxyl, phytophthora, phytophthora root rot, PRR, resistant, sample collection, seed treatment, thiabendazole, thiram, variety, Warwicken
dc.titlePhytophthora root rot–reduced yield losses in crosses with wild Cicer relatives – Warwick 2018en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2019en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR-2019-P04-Bithell-+.pdf138.05 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing