NSW Dept of Planning and Environment
A NSW Government website
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15405Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Bird, Lisa | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Miles, Melina | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-01T01:13:09Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-01T01:13:09Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2208-8199 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15405 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Key findings: • Fall armyworm (FAW) has minimal resistance to selective insecticides containing the actives emamectin benzoate, chlorantraniliprole, spinosad and spinetoram. • Reduced sensitivity to indoxacarb is probably due to naturally higher tolerance in FAW compared with Helicoverpa species. • FAW has moderate resistance to carbamates. • High resistance to synthetic pyrethroids in FAW is due to metabolic resistance. • A strategic approach to insecticide selection and rotation is required to minimise further resistance development and optimise the cost-effectiveness of insecticide applications. | en |
| dc.publisher | Department of Primary Industries | en |
| dc.subject | alpha-cypermethrin, chlorantraniliprole, controlled environment, emamectin, fall army worm, indoxacarb, laboratory, maize, methomyl, resistance, resistance screening, spinetoram | en |
| dc.title | Insecticide resistance in fall armyworm | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Northern NSW research results 2021 | en |
| dc.type | Book chapter | en |
| Appears in Collections: | DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present] | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRR21-17-Bird-fall armyworm-resistance-+.pdf | 438.94 kB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.