Effects of early and late waterlogging on phytophthora root rot and chickpea resistance

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15373

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Dron, Nicole	-
dc.contributor.author	Simpfendorfer, Steven	-
dc.contributor.author	Sutton, Tim	-
dc.contributor.author	Pengilley, Georgina	-
dc.contributor.author	Hobson, Kristy	-
dc.date.accessioned	2024-09-29T23:57:43Z	-
dc.date.available	2024-09-29T23:57:43Z	-
dc.date.issued	2022	-
dc.identifier.issn	2208-8199	-
dc.identifier.uri	https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15373	-
dc.description.abstract	Key findings • Waterlogging had a greater effect on chickpea yield when compared with phytophthora root rot (PRR) disease. • Commercial chickpea varieties, such as PBA HatTrick[PBR], were more affected by waterlogging during the late vegetative growth stage (83% yield loss) than the early vegetative growth stage (26% yield loss). • Late waterlogging plus PRR infection resulted in rapid plant death and up to 98% yield loss. • Waterlogging reduces the plant’s ability to overcome PRR infection, even in varieties with higher resistance PRR.	en
dc.publisher	Department of Primary Industries	en
dc.subject	chickpea, controlled environment, grain weight, inoculum, phytophthora root rot, PRR, Tamworth, variety, waterlogging, yield loss	en
dc.title	Effects of early and late waterlogging on phytophthora root rot and chickpea resistance	en
dc.title.alternative	Northern NSW research results 2022	en
dc.type	Book chapter	en
Appears in Collections:	DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
NRR22-1-Dron Simpf phythopthora chickpea root rot-+.pdf		344.45 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Who's citing

NSW Dept of Planning and Environment