Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15337
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Eric-
dc.contributor.authorGaynor, Luke-
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Gerard-
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorCoombes, Neil-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T23:16:26Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-25T23:16:26Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn2652-6948-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15337-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Pulse crops offer significant advantages to following wheat crops in southern NSW. • Brown manuring offered no yield advantage for the following crop over harvesting pulses for grain. • Choose the pulse crop best suited to your soils, environment and system.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2014, brown manure, faba bean, field pea, legumes, lupin, protein, pulses, rotation, sowing date, variety, vetch, wheat, yielden
dc.titleResidual effects of a pulse crop phase in the farming systemen
dc.title.alternativeSouthern NSW research results 2014en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
SRR14-5 Armstrong residual pulse-+.pdf131.96 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing