Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15334
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcMaster, Colin-
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Neroli-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T23:01:00Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-25T23:01:00Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn2652-6948-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15334-
dc.description.abstractKey findings In 2011, 58% of canola (Hyola® 575CL) grain yield was attributed to increased stored soil moisture and nitrogen retained from a weed-free fallow. • Controlling summer weeds increased: »» canola grain yield by 0.83 t/ha where full weed control was implemented »» plant available water (PAW) at sowing by 86 mm and 50 mm in 2011 and 2012, respectively »» mineral nitrogen by 69 and 45 kg N/ha in 2011 and 2012, respectively. • For every 1 mm of moisture lost through summer weed growth, mineral nitrogen levels were reduced by approximately 0.56 kg N/ha. • Summer weeds used soil moisture to a depth of at least 1.2 m. • Every dollar invested in controlling summer weeds returned up to $7.20/ha. • Where full fallow weed control was implemented, the return on investment (ROI) was up to 720%.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2011, 2012, canola, Forbes, grain yield, moisture stress, nutrient rentention, plant available water, summer, weedsen
dc.titleSummer weeds reduce moisture and nitrogen—Forbes 2011 and 2012en
dc.title.alternativeSouthern NSW research results 2014en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
SRR14-2 McMaster summer weeds-+.pdf319.44 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing