Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15326
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorGaynor, Luke-
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Mathew-
dc.contributor.authorBoulton, Alan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T06:06:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-25T06:06:14Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2652-6948-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15326-
dc.description.abstractKey findings »» Bidgee[PBR] and Djakal performed best at 45 plants/m2. »» N005A-80 and Snowy[PBR] performed best at 30 plants/m2. »» Severe lodging occurred in all varieties at the 60 plants/m2 sowing density. »» Snowy[PBR] has poor resistance to lodging, which was exacerbated at higher sowing densities.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2014, 2015, density, grain yield, Leeton, lodging, self mulching medium clay, soybean, target plant population, varietyen
dc.titlePlant population density soybeans – southern NSW 2014–15en
dc.title.alternativeSouthern NSW research results 2015en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
SRR15-62-Richards Gaynor soy density-+.pdf178.02 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing