Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15314
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorGaynor, Luke-
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Mathew-
dc.contributor.authorBoulton, Alan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T05:18:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-25T05:18:56Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2652-6948-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15314-
dc.description.abstractKey findings »» Djakal has powdery mildew resistance. »» Other varieties are susceptible to powdery mildew. »» New chemistries are effective in powdery mildew control. »» Split fungicide application can have excellent results. »» Bidgee[PBR] and Djakal grain yields were not affected by powdery mildew. »» Snowy[PBR] and N005A-80 grain yields were reduced by powdery mildew.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2014, 2015, disease resistance, fungicide, grain yield, Leeton, powdery mildew, southern, soybean, split application, tebuconazole, varietyen
dc.titlePowdery mildew control in soybeans – southern NSW 2014–15en
dc.title.alternativeSouthern NSW research results 2015en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
SRR15-51a-Richards Gaynor soy powdery-+.pdf185.78 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing