Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15259
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWu, Hanwen-
dc.contributor.authorShephard, Adam-
dc.contributor.authorHopwood, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-23T05:04:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-23T05:04:28Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn2652-6948-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15259-
dc.description.abstractKey findings •• It is difficult to effectively control witch grass in summer. •• No single herbicide treatment achieved 100% control. •• Glyphosate-based herbicide treatments were the best performers, achieving 86–88% control. •• The mixture of glyphosate + simazine had residual control on subsequent emergences.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subjectfield, glyphosate, herbicide, simazine, summer crops, witch grassen
dc.titlePost-emergent herbicidal options for witch grass (Panicum capillare) control in summer fallowsen
dc.title.alternativeSouthern NSW research results 2017en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
SRR2017-Wu Shephard witch grass-+.pdf381.62 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing