Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15182
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Felicity-
dc.contributor.authorKanaley, Hugh-
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, Greg-
dc.contributor.authorCopeland, Cameron-
dc.contributor.authorPetty, Hayden-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-20T02:00:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-20T02:00:27Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn2652-6948-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15182-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • • New winter genotypes had different phenology responses compared with current commercial genotypes. • • Frost significantly affected phenology and grain yield responses in 2017. • • The highest grain yields were achieved through various sowing date × variety combinations. • • Best management practice is matching varietal phenology with sowing date, however, pre-flowering phases had a significant influence on grain yield responses.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2017, fast, frost, grain quality, grain yield, mid, mid-slow, phenology, photoperiod, red kandosol, slow, sowing date, spring, variety, vernalisation, Wallendbeen, wheat, winter, winteren
dc.titleEarly sowing options: sowing date influence on phenology and grain yield of long-season wheat genotypes – Wallendbeen 2017en
dc.title.alternativeSouthern NSW research results 2018en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
SRR-2018-Harris-3-+.pdf222.99 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing