Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15158
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNapier, Tony-
dc.contributor.authorMaphosa, Lance-
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Mark-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-19T01:20:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-19T01:20:31Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2652-6948-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15158-
dc.description.abstractKey findings •• The low mean yield averaged across sowing dates and varieties (1.23 t/ha) at this site was largely attributed to limited pre-sowing moisture and low (87 mm) in-crop rainfall. •• Genesis™ 090 showed more signs of susceptibility to drought stress than other varieties. •• Late April and mid May sowing dates produced higher yields overall. •• There was an interaction between sowing date and variety for phenological development and harvest index, but not for grain yield. •• Growing degree days affected time to emergence, with delayed time to emergence as sowing date was delayed into late autumn, but there was no effect on plant density.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2018, biomass, brown chromosol, chickpea, desi chickpea, dry, grain yield, harvest index, kabuli chickpea, moisture stress, phenology, sowing date, variety, Yancoen
dc.titleChickpea phenology and grain yield response to sowing date – Yanco 2018en
dc.title.alternativeSouthern NSW research results 2019en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
SRR2019-Napier-2-+.pdf496.44 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing