1. DPIE eLibrary
  2. Primary Industries and Regional Publications
  3. DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15128
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUddin, Shihab-
dc.contributor.authorOates, Albert-
dc.contributor.authorAslam, Naveed-
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, David-
dc.contributor.authorPitt, Wayne-
dc.contributor.authorHildebrand, Shane-
dc.contributor.authorJia, Yan-
dc.contributor.authorOrgill, Susan-
dc.contributor.authorSandral, Graeme-
dc.contributor.authorTavakkoli, Ehsan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T03:27:02Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-18T03:27:02Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2652-6948-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15128-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Genotypic variability observed in response to wheat grain yield in alkaline sodic subsoil. • Mace[PBR], Corack[PBR], Scepter[PBR] and Emu Rock[PBR] were the top performing cultivars over three consecutive years. • Higher grain yield was attributed to greater subsoil water extraction and capacity to maintain higher harvest index under drought conditions.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2019, biomass, grain yield, Grogan, harvest index, sodic, sodosol, variety, wheaten
dc.titleScreening wheat genotypes in alkaline sodic subsoilen
dc.title.alternativeSouthern NSW research results 2020en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
SRR20-11-Uddin2-genotype-+.pdf166.21 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing