Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15108
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Guangdi-
dc.contributor.authorNewell, Matthew-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T01:04:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-18T01:04:27Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn2652-6948-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15108-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Lucerne target establishment density for dryland environments should not exceed 50 plants/m2; or 28 plants/m of drill row. • Changing row configuration did not increase lucerne persistence. • Sowing lucerne with a cover crop reduced final lucerne density by 39%. • Lucerne mortality is affected more by summer conditions than the presence of wintergrowing companion species, such as phalaris or subterranean clover.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2012, 2016, barley, Bogan Gate, canola, central west, clover, Condobolin, cover crop, Cowra, dryland, establishment, Eurongilly, heat, lucerne, lupin, Mirrool, pasture, phalaris, Riverina, sowing configuration, Wagga Wagga, wheaten
dc.titleManaging competition and lucerne persistence with sowing configurationen
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2021en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
SRR21-15-Hayes-lucerne-sowingconfig.-+pdf.pdf252.59 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing