Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20314
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorMortell, Patrick-
dc.contributor.authorMorphett, Stephen-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-05T04:05:51Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-05T04:05:51Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/20314-
dc.description.abstractKey findings • Row spacing did not significantly reduce the impact of weed competition on grain yield. However, row orientation and variety selection were found to be useful cost effective tools to reduce weed competition. • A vigorous variety such as Skipper[PBR] reduced weed competition by potentially 30–40%, while an east-west row orientation was shown to reduce weed competition by approximately 40% compared to the north-south row orientation. • Although row spacing was not shown to reduce weed competition it was shown to limit yield potential by up to 11% when a 50 cm row spacing was used compared to a 30 cm spacing.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2012, barley, Bithramere, canola, grain yield, in-row, inter-row, row orientation, row spacing, target plant population, variety, weedsen
dc.titleUsing row orientation, row spacing and variety selection as weed management tools – Bithramere 2012en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2013en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR13-12 Gardner weed row variety-+.pdf227.54 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing