Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15587
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSerafin, Lorettaen
dc.contributor.authorHellyer, Marken
dc.contributor.authorPerfrement, Peteren
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T06:06:14Zen
dc.date.available2024-10-17T06:06:14Zen
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199en
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15587en
dc.description.abstractKey findings • The solid 75 cm or single skip row configurations produced the highest yields at this site in this season. • Plant population also affected yield and grain quality, with the 15,000 plants/ha or 30,000 plants/ha treatments providing the best outcomes. • The maize hybrid P1070 performed best at this site in this season. The larger plant biomass hybrid PAC624 struggled under the tough dryland conditions at this site.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2015, 2016, establishment, grain quality, grain weight, grain yield, maize, population, row configuration, Spring Ridge, varietyen
dc.titleMaize row configuration × population × hybrid – Spring Ridge 2014–15en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2016en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR2016-serafin Hellyer maize Spring Ridge-+.pdf136.18 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing