Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15541
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchwenke, Graeme-
dc.contributor.authorMcPherson, Annabelle-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-16T05:34:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-16T05:34:22Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn2208-8199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nswdpe.intersearch.com.au/nswdpejspui/handle/1/15541-
dc.description.abstractKey findings •• Changing the pre-plant nitrogen (N) fertiliser location from beside the non-irrigated furrow to beside the irrigated furrow increased nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, primarily from the fertiliser band location. •• Irrigating every single furrow instead of every second furrow did not significantly change N2O emissions. •• Altering irrigation furrows in relation to pre-plant N fertiliser did not significantly affect mineral N in the surface soil, nor did it affect any measure of crop production. •• These results do not support changing from the current irrigation and N fertiliser placement system in use.en
dc.publisherDepartment of Primary Industriesen
dc.subject2015, black vertosol, cotton, in-crop, irrigation, Moree, nitrogen, nitrous oxide emissions, pre planting/sowing, soil mineral nitrogen, soil moistureen
dc.titleDoes pre-plant nitrogen fertiliser location affect soil mineral nitrogen and nitrous oxide emissions from irrigated cotton at Moree?en
dc.title.alternativeNorthern NSW research results 2017en
dc.typeBook chapteren
Appears in Collections:DPI Agriculture - Southern and Northern Research Results [2011-present]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NRR2017-42-Schwenke-+.pdf489.68 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing